{"id":4992,"date":"2026-02-16T15:23:31","date_gmt":"2026-02-16T15:23:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jinyipackage.com\/?p=4992"},"modified":"2026-02-16T15:23:31","modified_gmt":"2026-02-16T15:23:31","slug":"soft-touch-foil-spot-uv-on-skincare-gift-boxes-when-finishes-fight-each-other-and-how-i-prevent-rework","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jinyipackage.com\/de\/custom-boxes\/soft-touch-foil-spot-uv-on-skincare-gift-boxes-when-finishes-fight-each-other-and-how-i-prevent-rework\/","title":{"rendered":"Soft-Touch + Folie + UV-Spot auf Geschenkboxen f\u00fcr Hautpflegeprodukte: Wenn sich die Oberfl\u00e4chen gegenseitig bek\u00e4mpfen und wie ich Nacharbeit verhindere?"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/h1>\n

I see skincare gift boxes that look perfect in the studio, then turn into rework nightmares in production: soft-touch goes shiny, foil turns dull or lifts, and spot UV peels or leaves ugly halos.<\/p>\n

I prevent rework by treating finishes as one surface system.<\/strong> I classify the failure, lock the process sequence, and write a spec that controls adhesion, friction, registration, and curing\u2014before the first mass run.<\/p>\n


\nSee a rigid flip-top gift box format where finish stacking and abrasion control matter
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\"cosmetic<\/p>\n

I do not treat soft-touch, foil, and spot UV as three independent upgrades. I treat them as three layers with three different friction behaviors, three adhesion windows, and three opportunities for drift. If I do not lock sequence and tolerances, the finishes will fight each other and the box will lose its premium look fast.<\/p>\n

\n

Define the \u201cFinish Fight\u201d First: Scuff, Dull Foil, UV Edge Lift, or Fingerprint Patchiness?<\/h2>\n

I never accept \u201cthe finish looks bad\u201d as a diagnosis. I need to know which failure happened, because each failure points to a different root cause.<\/p>\n

I classify finish fights into four types: soft-touch scuff and rub-to-shine, dull foil and edge lift, spot UV edge lift or cracking, and fingerprint patchiness. When I classify first, I can lock the right variables instead of blaming the wrong process.<\/p>\n

My finish fight map (what failed vs what I lock)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Failure<\/th>\nWhat it looks like<\/th>\nWhat usually causes it<\/th>\nWhat I lock first<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Soft-touch scuff \/ rub-to-shine<\/td>\nMatte turns glossy in high-contact areas<\/td>\nHigh friction + vibration rubbing<\/td>\nPack-out friction control + surface selection<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Foil dull \/ edge lift<\/td>\nShine turns gray, edges start peeling<\/td>\nLow adhesion on soft-touch + rubbing at edges<\/td>\nAdhesion zone rules + edge protection strategy<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Spot UV edge lift \/ crack<\/td>\nUV peels at edges or cracks after bending<\/td>\nWetting window too narrow + cure drift<\/td>\nUV artwork rules + cure window + dwell time<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fingerprint patchiness<\/td>\nUneven marks, \u201cdirty\u201d zones, tone shifts<\/td>\nOil transfer + mixed surface energy<\/td>\nTouch-point design + finish zoning<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

From a production standpoint, this matters because the wrong fix creates the next failure. In real manufacturing, this detail often determines whether a factory increases pressure to make foil stick and accidentally creates micro-cracks that peel later. From our daily packaging work, we see that each defect has a different \u201cfirst lever.\u201d Soft-touch scuffs are often shipping friction problems, not coating quality problems. Foil edge lift is often an adhesion zone problem, not a foil film problem. Spot UV halos are often wetting and thickness problems, not \u201cbad UV.\u201d Fingerprints are often a touch-point and surface-energy problem, not \u201ccustomers have dirty hands.\u201d I always classify first so the spec becomes targeted instead of emotional.<\/p>\n

\n

Order of Operations Decides Everything: Why the Same Materials Behave Differently by Sequence?<\/h2>\n

Many teams ask me to pick materials, then they leave the process order to the supplier. That is how rework starts.<\/p>\n

I lock the order because soft-touch film, foil, and spot UV behave differently depending on what sits under them and what was cured before them. Sequence changes adhesion, hardness, and friction, so it changes outcomes.<\/p>\n

Finish sequence choices I control<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Sequence decision<\/th>\nWhat can go wrong<\/th>\nWhat I specify<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Foil on soft-touch<\/td>\nEdge lift, dulling, poor bond<\/td>\nUse stampable soft-touch or leave foil zones unlaminated<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Spot UV on soft-touch<\/td>\nHalo rings, edge lift<\/td>\nDefine UV line rules, thickness target, and cure window<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cure and rest time between steps<\/td>\nBlocking, haze, delayed peeling<\/td>\nMinimum cure + resting time and handling limits<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

From a production standpoint, this matters because \u201csame materials\u201d do not equal \u201csame results.\u201d In real manufacturing, this detail often determines whether your sample is repeatable. If a supplier changes the order to hit a deadline, the adhesion window can collapse. I therefore write the process sequence as a hard requirement, not a suggestion. I also write what must be cured, how long it must rest, and what must not be touched in between. From our daily packaging work, we see rework happen when people treat curing as optional. A surface can look dry and still be unstable under stack pressure, and that instability shows up as peeling or blocking later. I lock the order so the finish stack behaves like a system, not like three separate effects.<\/p>\n

\n

Soft-Touch as the Base Layer: When It Becomes a Low-Adhesion Trap for Foil and UV?<\/h2>\n

Soft-touch looks premium, but it can become a low-adhesion trap. I treat it as a material choice that must be compatible with whatever goes on top.<\/p>\n

If the soft-touch surface has low surface energy, both foil and spot UV can behave like they are sitting on a non-stick layer. I either choose a stampable\/UV-friendly system or I design zones that avoid bonding on the wrong surface.<\/p>\n

How I avoid the soft-touch adhesion trap<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Risk<\/th>\nWhat I see<\/th>\nMy prevention move<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Low surface energy<\/td>\nFoil lifts at edges; UV peels<\/td>\nSelect stampable soft-touch or add controlled base layer<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Soft surface under pressure<\/td>\nEmboss marks, gloss spots<\/td>\nDefine pressure limits and contact protection<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Contamination sensitivity<\/td>\nPatchy adhesion and halos<\/td>\nHandling rules + clean storage + rest time<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

In real manufacturing, this detail often determines whether the first cartons pass and later cartons peel after shipping. From our daily packaging work, we see many \u201cfoil problems\u201d that are actually soft-touch compatibility problems. I do not let suppliers guess. I lock which soft-touch film system is allowed, and I lock whether foil and UV must land on a dedicated zone. If I need foil and UV on the same panel, I often separate \u201ctouch zones\u201d and \u201cdecoration zones.\u201d I make sure the decoration zones are engineered for adhesion, not optimized for hand-feel. That zoning is one of the simplest ways to keep soft-touch premium without making the rest of the finish stack fragile.<\/p>\n

\n

Foil on Top of Soft-Touch: Why Shine Turns Dull and Edges Start Peeling in Cartons?<\/h2>\n

Foil on soft-touch can look amazing. It can also fail in the exact way brands hate: dull shine and lifted edges after shipping.<\/p>\n

I assume shipping is a friction machine. If foil edges sit on a soft-touch base and the carton rubs, the edges become the first failure point. I lock edge rules and pack-out protection, not only stamping settings.<\/p>\n

\"cosmetic<\/p>\n

What I lock to protect foil on soft-touch<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Foil risk<\/th>\nWhy it happens<\/th>\nWhat I lock<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Edge lift<\/td>\nAdhesion weak at boundary + rubbing<\/td>\nNo-foil edge margin + edge shape rules<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Dull shine<\/td>\nMicro-scratches from vibration rubbing<\/td>\nPack-out isolation + controlled contact surfaces<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Micro-cracks<\/td>\nOverstamping stress<\/td>\nProcess window limits, not \u201cmore pressure\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

From a production standpoint, this matters because foil does not fail like ink. In real manufacturing, this detail often determines whether returns spike after a long e-commerce route. I write rules that protect foil edges, because edges are where stress concentrates and where rubbing starts. I also write pack-out rules because I assume cartons will vibrate. From our daily packaging work, we see that foil dulling is often a pack-out issue, not a stamping issue. If boxes are packed tight with partitions or interleaves, foil stays bright much longer. If boxes are loose and rubbing, even the best foil will look tired. I do not accept \u201cwe used premium foil\u201d as a protection plan.<\/p>\n

\n

Spot UV on Soft-Touch: The Hidden Failure Is Edge Lift and Halo Rings?<\/h2>\n

Spot UV on soft-touch creates a strong premium contrast. It also has a narrow wetting and adhesion window, so small drift creates big visual defects.<\/p>\n

I focus on edge rules and thickness control. The \u201chidden failure\u201d is not only peeling. It is also halo rings and uneven gloss that makes the box look cheap.<\/p>\n

Spot UV rules I lock for soft-touch<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
UV defect<\/th>\nWhat it looks like<\/th>\nMy lock-in rule<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Edge lift<\/td>\nUV starts peeling from the border<\/td>\nMinimum feature size + avoid razor-thin borders<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Halo ring<\/td>\nBright outline around UV area<\/td>\nControlled thickness target + stable cure window<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Uneven gloss<\/td>\nPatchy shine<\/td>\nScreen\/plate standard + viscosity control<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

In real manufacturing, this detail often determines whether your spot UV looks premium or looks like a mistake. From our daily packaging work, we see halo rings appear when UV thickness changes or when the surface energy changes across the panel. I therefore write design rules: no ultra-thin UV borders, no tiny isolated dots that can lift, and no UV crossing heavy bend zones. I also write process rules: thickness target, cure window, and handling limits. If the supplier cannot control those, I shrink UV areas or move UV to a safer zone. I would rather reduce UV coverage than create a finish that forces rework on every batch.<\/p>\n

\n

Three Finishes = Three Friction Behaviors: Why Mixed COF Creates Scuffs and Patchy Wear?<\/h2>\n

Soft-touch, foil, and spot UV each have different friction behavior. That mismatch is the real reason finishes \u201cfight\u201d in shipping.<\/p>\n

If a carton rubs, the high-friction area wears first, the low-friction area stays clean, and the box develops patchy wear. I control friction paths with zoning and pack-out, not only with \u201cstronger coatings.\u201d<\/p>\n

My friction map approach<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Finish<\/th>\nTypical friction behavior<\/th>\nWear result in shipping<\/th>\nMy control move<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Soft-touch<\/td>\nOften higher friction<\/td>\nRub-to-shine and scuff<\/td>\nReduce rubbing exposure with pack-out isolation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Foil<\/td>\nHard surface but scratch-sensitive<\/td>\nDulling and scratching<\/td>\nProtect foil zones from contact<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Spot UV<\/td>\nHard islands with edge risk<\/td>\nEdge lift under abrasion<\/td>\nAvoid edge exposure and control thickness<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

From a production standpoint, this matters because the finish stack can fail even when each finish is \u201cgood\u201d alone. In real manufacturing, this detail often determines why a box looks fine in a short retail route but fails in e-commerce. I therefore design the panel like a friction map. I decide where hands touch, where cartons rub, and where edges can get hit. Then I place finishes so they do not create fragile boundaries in high-contact zones. If the route is harsh, I also recommend protective pack-out: interleaves, sleeves, or partitions. From our daily packaging work, we see that pack-out solves more scuff complaints than changing coatings, because it removes the rubbing that causes the wear.<\/p>\n

\n

Registration & Tolerance Reality: When Misalignment Makes Foil\/UV Look Cheap Overnight?<\/h2>\n

Three finishes mean three alignments. If registration drifts, the premium look disappears immediately.<\/p>\n

I lock tolerances and I design \u201cfor forgiveness.\u201d I do not wait until production to discover that the design had no margin for drift.<\/p>\n

Registration risks and what I lock<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Misalignment issue<\/th>\nWhat it causes<\/th>\nMy prevention rule<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
UV overlaps foil edge<\/td>\nVisible \u201cmistake border\u201d and peeling risk<\/td>\nKeep safe spacing and define max drift tolerance<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Foil shifts out of its zone<\/td>\nBreaks the design and exposes weak edges<\/td>\nDesign margin + supplier alignment checkpoints<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Spot UV off target<\/td>\nCheap look and uneven contrast<\/td>\nLock alignment method + in-process sampling<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

In real manufacturing, this detail often determines whether your box looks \u201cluxury\u201d or \u201cmisprinted.\u201d From our daily packaging work, we see brands blame factories for misalignment when the artwork gave zero margin. I fix that at the design stage. I require safe zones, spacing, and minimum distances between finishes. I also write the tolerance in the spec so nobody guesses what \u201cacceptable\u201d means. If a supplier cannot hold tight registration, I simplify the finish interactions by reducing overlaps and moving details away from edges and folds. My goal is not perfection on one sample. My goal is stable beauty at scale.<\/p>\n

\n

Mass Production Window: Curing Time, Blocking Risk, and Why \u201cLooks Dry\u201d Still Sticks in Cartons?<\/h2>\n

Many rework disasters are not about visuals at all. They are about blocking: surfaces sticking together under pressure and then tearing or lifting when separated.<\/p>\n

I lock curing and resting windows because soft-touch and spot UV can look dry while still being soft under stack compression. If cartons block, they can peel UV and dull foil in one move.<\/p>\n

Blocking controls I include<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Blocking trigger<\/th>\nWhat happens<\/th>\nWhat I lock<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Insufficient cure<\/td>\nStickiness under pressure<\/td>\nMinimum cure parameters and rest time<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Hot stacking<\/td>\nSurfaces soften and bond<\/td>\nTemperature limits and stack height rules<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Tight packing without interleave<\/td>\nFinish-to-finish contact damage<\/td>\nInterleaves, sleeves, or partitions<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

From a production standpoint, this matters because blocking creates multi-symptom failure: UV lifts, soft-touch glosses, and foil dulls at once. In real manufacturing, this detail often determines whether the last 30% of an order becomes a rework pile. I do not let \u201cwe need to ship today\u201d override the cure and rest window. I specify when the cartons can be stacked, what the storage temperature must be, and what isolation is required in pack-out. From our daily packaging work, we see blocking most often after a rush schedule, when cartons are packed warm and pressed in a master carton. I prevent that with clear rules that production can follow.<\/p>\n

\n

My \u201cNo-Rework\u201d Spec Checklist: What I Lock So Suppliers Cannot Guess?<\/h2>\n

When I hear \u201cwe can do soft-touch + foil + spot UV,\u201d I still assume rework risk until the spec is complete.<\/p>\n

I lock the finish system, the zones, the order, the tolerances, and the tests. If a supplier must guess, the supplier will guess wrong.<\/p>\n

My no-rework checklist for the finish stack<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Spec item<\/th>\nWhy I lock it<\/th>\nWhat it prevents<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Soft-touch film system (stampable\/UV-friendly)<\/td>\nAdhesion and stability<\/td>\nFoil\/UV lifting<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Finish zoning + \u201cno-finish\u201d boundaries<\/td>\nControls bonding and friction<\/td>\nEdge failures and patchy wear<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Artwork rules (min lines, spacing, radii)<\/td>\nPrevents fragile details<\/td>\nCracks, halos, broken lines<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Process order + cure\/rest windows<\/td>\nRepeatability at speed<\/td>\nBlocking and delayed peeling<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Registration tolerance + sampling plan<\/td>\nControls multi-step alignment<\/td>\nCheap-looking misalignment<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Pack-out isolation requirements<\/td>\nRemoves rubbing exposure<\/td>\nScuff, dull foil, UV edge wear<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

From our daily packaging work, we see rework drop sharply when the spec becomes unambiguous. In real manufacturing, this detail often determines whether the supplier can run consistently across shifts. I write what must be tested before mass production: abrasion check, tape\/adhesion check, and blocking check under stack pressure. I also write the acceptance limits, because \u201cslight scuff\u201d means different things to different teams. When the spec is clear, suppliers stop guessing and production becomes stable. That is how I protect both the finish and the schedule.<\/p>\n

\n

Decision Matrix: When I Still Use the Trio vs When I Split Finishes to Protect Yield?<\/h2>\n

I do not force the trio on every skincare gift box. Some routes and colors punish this stack too much.<\/p>\n

I choose the trio when the route is controlled and the brand values tactile impact. I split finishes when friction, e-commerce handling, and dark colors create a high rework risk.<\/p>\n

My decision matrix (use the trio or simplify)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Condition<\/th>\nMy recommendation<\/th>\nWhy<\/th>\nHow I protect yield<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Retail route, controlled handling<\/td>\nUse soft-touch + foil + spot UV<\/td>\nHigh shelf impact<\/td>\nLock order, zoning, and pack-out basics<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
E-commerce route, long transit<\/td>\nSimplify or reduce UV\/foil exposure<\/td>\nFriction and blocking risk<\/td>\nMove finishes to safer panels or add isolation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Deep dark colors<\/td>\nBe cautious with soft-touch<\/td>\nShows scuffs and fingerprints more<\/td>\nDesign touch zones and add protection<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

From a production standpoint, this matters because \u201cpremium\u201d is not only how it looks on day one. In real manufacturing, this detail often determines whether you hit delivery without rework. If the route is harsh, I reduce the finish interactions: I shrink UV areas, move foil away from high-contact edges, or place decoration on an inner tray or sleeve. I still keep the premium story, but I protect yield. I always give two options: a display-tier stack and a production-tier stack. That helps brands choose impact without gambling on stability.<\/p>\n

\n

Schlussfolgerung<\/h2>\n

I prevent rework by treating soft-touch, foil, and spot UV as one system. I lock sequence, zoning, tolerances, cure windows, and pack-out so the finish survives real shipping.<\/p>\n


\nGet a No-Rework Finish Stack Plan
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

About Me<\/h2>\n

About JINYI<\/h3>\n

Brand:<\/strong> Jinyi
\nSlogan:<\/strong> Vom Film bis zur Fertigstellung - alles richtig gemacht.
\nWebsite:<\/strong> https:\/\/jinyipackage.com\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Our mission:<\/strong> I deliver reliable, usable, production-ready packaging so brands spend less time clarifying details and get more predictable quality, clearer lead times, and structures that match real use.<\/p>\n

About me:<\/strong> JINYI is a source manufacturer specializing in custom flexible packaging solutions, with over 15 years of production experience serving food, snack, pet food, and daily consumer brands.<\/p>\n

We operate a standardized manufacturing facility equipped with multiple gravure printing lines as well as advanced HP digital printing systems, allowing us to support both stable large-volume orders and flexible short runs with consistent quality.<\/p>\n

From material selection to finished pouches, we focus on process control, repeatability, and real-world performance. Our goal is to help brands reduce communication costs, achieve predictable quality, and ensure packaging performs reliably on shelf, in transit, and at end use.<\/p>\n

\n

FAQ<\/h2>\n

1) Why does soft-touch turn shiny on skincare gift boxes?<\/h3>\n

Soft-touch can rub-to-shine under vibration and repeated contact. I reduce rubbing exposure with pack-out isolation and finish zoning.<\/p>\n

2) Why does foil lift or turn dull on top of soft-touch?<\/h3>\n

Low adhesion on soft-touch and edge rubbing are common causes. I lock stampable systems, safe margins, and edge protection rules.<\/p>\n

3) What causes spot UV halos on soft-touch?<\/h3>\n

Halos often come from narrow wetting windows and uneven UV thickness. I lock artwork rules, thickness targets, and cure conditions.<\/p>\n

4) What is blocking and why does it cause rework?<\/h3>\n

Blocking is when surfaces stick together under pressure. It can lift UV, dull foil, and mark soft-touch. I lock cure\/rest time and pack-out rules.<\/p>\n

5) When should I avoid using soft-touch + foil + spot UV together?<\/h3>\n

I simplify the stack for long e-commerce routes, deep dark colors, and high-friction pack-outs unless the brand accepts more protection steps.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I see skincare gift boxes that look perfect in the studio, then turn into rework nightmares in production: soft-touch goes shiny, foil turns dull or lifts, and spot UV peels or leaves ugly halos. I prevent rework by treating finishes as one surface system. I classify the failure, lock the process sequence, and write a…<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":4988,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_seopress_titles_title":"Soft-Touch + Foil + Spot UV: Stop Rework on Skincare Gift Boxes?","_seopress_titles_desc":"I explain why soft-touch, foil, and spot UV \u201cfight\u201d each other and how I prevent scuffs, dull foil, UV lift, and blocking by locking sequence and specs.","_seopress_robots_index":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[112,28,108],"tags":[47,131,118,132],"class_list":{"0":"post-4992","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-beauty-personal-care","8":"category-custom-boxes","9":"category-packaging-academy","10":"tag-carton-packaging-","11":"tag-carton-protection---","12":"tag-skincare-and-daily-use-packaging","13":"tag-skincare-product-packaging-"},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jinyipackage.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4992","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jinyipackage.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jinyipackage.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jinyipackage.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jinyipackage.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4992"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/jinyipackage.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4992\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4995,"href":"https:\/\/jinyipackage.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4992\/revisions\/4995"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jinyipackage.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4988"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jinyipackage.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4992"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jinyipackage.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4992"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jinyipackage.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4992"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}